Jack Lin
Impact in
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 10%
- Tendon Structure and Treatment
- Oral Surgery top 10%
- Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Papers in
- Surgery 4
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 2
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 2
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 1
- Co-authors
- Simon Bogdansky (2 shared papers)Ren‐Yo Forng (2 shared papers)William N. Drohan (2 shared papers)Wilson H. Burgess (2 shared papers)R. E. Stafford (1 shared paper)Brent G. Parks (1 shared paper)Jasmien Wellens (2 shared papers)Marika Nespi (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Biomaterials (1 paper)Blood (1 paper)Journal of Orthopaedic Research® (1 paper)BMC Neuroscience (1 paper)Retina (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Jack Lin
9 papers receiving 182 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 39
- Oral Surgery 29
- Surgery 106
- Gastroenterology 13
- Ophthalmology 18
Countries citing papers authored by Jack Lin
This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Lin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Lin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Lin. The network helps show where Jack Lin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jack Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 81 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 60 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 17 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 9 | PLX9486 shows anti-tumor efficacy in a patient-derived gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) xenograft model resistant to standard tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) | 2015 | 1 |
About Jack Lin
Jack Lin is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Gastroenterology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 9 papers that have together received 192 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (2 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (2 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (2 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (2 papers), Ocular Oncology and Treatments (1 paper), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (1 paper), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (1 paper) and Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (39 citations), Oral Surgery (29 citations), Surgery (106 citations), Gastroenterology (13 citations) and Ophthalmology (18 citations). Jack Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Simon Bogdansky, Ren‐Yo Forng, William N. Drohan, Wilson H. Burgess, R. E. Stafford, Brent G. Parks, Jasmien Wellens, Marika Nespi, Raf Sciot and Gideon Bollag. Their work appears in journals such as Biomaterials, Blood, Journal of Orthopaedic Research®, BMC Neuroscience and Retina.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.