Jack Ladinsky

562 citations
14 papers · 454 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • Law top 2%
    • Legal Education and Practice Innovations
    • Judicial and Constitutional Studies
    • Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
    • Gender Diversity and Inequality

Papers in

  • Law 6
    • Legal Education and Practice Innovations 5
    • Business Law and Ethics 4

Jack Ladinsky

13 papers receiving 332 citations

Peers

Jack Ladinsky
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Law 93
  • Gender Studies 78
  • Sociology and Political Science 163
  • Transportation 24
  • Economics and Econometrics 95
Replace John Grady with:
John Grady United States
Mason Ameri United States
Lisa Waddington Netherlands
Kenneth G. Lutterman United States
Martin Kaiser Germany
Jennifer Cyr United States
Maura Kelly United States
Katherine Stone United States
Mary Nell Trautner United States
Daniel Markovits United States
Jack Ladinsky relative to John Grady United States John Grady's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
John Grady · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Ladinsky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Ladinsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Ladinsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Ladinsky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Ladinsky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Ladinsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Ladinsky. The network helps show where Jack Ladinsky may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Jack Ladinsky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Ladinsky Line = papers co-authored together Jack Ladinsky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1979214
2 196775
3 196373
4 196631
5 196719
6 196311
7 19769
8 19676
9 19665
10
Professions and the public interest: where does pharmacy fit?
19735
11 19743
12 19731
13 20211
14 19701

About Jack Ladinsky

Jack Ladinsky is a scholar working on Law, Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations and Strategy and Management, having authored 14 papers that have together received 454 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal Education and Practice Innovations (5 papers), Business Law and Ethics (4 papers), Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation (2 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (1 paper), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (1 paper), Gender Diversity and Inequality (1 paper) and Workplace Spirituality and Leadership (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (93 citations), Gender Studies (78 citations), Sociology and Political Science (163 citations), Transportation (24 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (95 citations). Frequent co-authors include John P. Robinson, Lawrence M. Friedman, Erwin O. Smigel, Harold L. Wilensky, Jerome E. Carlin and Joel B. Grossman. Their work appears in journals such as American Sociological Review, Administrative Science Quarterly, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, Law & Society Review and Columbia Law Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact