Jack Ladinsky
Impact in
- Law top 2%
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Papers in
- Law 7
- Legal Education and Practice Innovations 4
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies 2
-
- Pharmacy and Medical Practices 3
- Co-authors
- John P. Robinson (1 shared paper)Lawrence M. Friedman (2 shared papers)Erwin O. Smigel (1 shared paper)Harold L. Wilensky (1 shared paper)Jerome E. Carlin (1 shared paper)Joel B. Grossman (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- American Sociological Review (3 papers)Law & Society Review (2 papers)Administrative Science Quarterly (2 papers)American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education (2 papers)Sociological Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Jack Ladinsky
14 papers receiving 320 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Law 88
- Gender Studies 68
- Sociology and Political Science 133
- Demography 29
- Transportation 15
Countries citing papers authored by Jack Ladinsky
This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Ladinsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Ladinsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Ladinsky more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Ladinsky
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Ladinsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Ladinsky. The network helps show where Jack Ladinsky may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Jack Ladinsky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1979 | 201 | |
| 2 | 1963 | 68 | |
| 3 | 1967 | 68 | |
| 4 | 1966 | 31 | |
| 5 | 1967 | 17 | |
| 6 | 1963 | 10 | |
| 7 | 1976 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1967 | 6 | |
| 9 | 1966 | 5 | |
| 10 | Professions and the public interest: where does pharmacy fit? | 1973 | 5 |
| 11 | 1974 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1970 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1973 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1976 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 1 |
About Jack Ladinsky
Jack Ladinsky is a scholar working on Law, Pharmacology, Political Science and International Relations, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 428 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal Education and Practice Innovations (4 papers), Pharmacy and Medical Practices (3 papers), Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (3 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 papers), Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies (2 papers), Labor Law and Work Dynamics (2 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers) and American Political and Social Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (88 citations), Gender Studies (68 citations), Sociology and Political Science (133 citations), Demography (29 citations) and Transportation (15 citations). Jack Ladinsky has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John P. Robinson, Lawrence M. Friedman, Erwin O. Smigel, Harold L. Wilensky, Jerome E. Carlin and Joel B. Grossman. Their work appears in journals such as American Sociological Review, Law & Society Review, Administrative Science Quarterly, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Sociological Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.