Jack Kuipers

9.2k citations
72 papers · 1.4k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Jack Kuipers

69 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Jack Kuipers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Cancer Research 531
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 192
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 13
  • Molecular Biology 555
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 220
Replace Jean-Philippe Brunet with:
Jean-Philippe Brunet United States
Stefano Lise United Kingdom
Xiaoliang Sunney Xie China
Purushottam D. Dixit United States
Olaf Nairz Austria
Ewa Gudowska–Nowak Poland
Abhinav Nellore United States
Markus Schulze Germany
Scott Walter United States
Jichang Wang China
Jack Kuipers relative to Jean-Philippe Brunet United States Jean-Philippe Brunet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Jean-Philippe Brunet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Kuipers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Kuipers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Kuipers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Kuipers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Kuipers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Kuipers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Kuipers. The network helps show where Jack Kuipers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jack Kuipers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Kuipers Line = papers co-authored together Jack Kuipers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016195
2 2017109
3 201798
4 201983
5 201780
6 201656
7 201852
8 202138
9 201835
10 201935
11 200533
12 201729
13 201624
14 201223
15 201422
16 201722
17 201821
18 202320
19 201619
20 200819

About Jack Kuipers

Jack Kuipers is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (26 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (18 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (16 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (8 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (8 papers), Quantum many-body systems (7 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (7 papers) and Quantum optics and atomic interactions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (531 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (192 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (13 citations), Molecular Biology (555 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (220 citations). Jack Kuipers has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Niko Beerenwinkel, Katharina Jahn, Giusi Moffa, Klaus Richter, Gregory Berkolaiko, Daniel Waltner, Paul Bebbington, Benjamin J. Raphael, Jochen Singer and Daniel Freeman. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Bioinformatics, PLoS Computational Biology, Physical Review B and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact