Jack Ingram
Impact in
- Museology top 5%
-
- Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
- Product Development and Customization
Papers in
-
- Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts 2
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction 2
-
- Educational Games and Gamification 3
- Co-authors
- Rachel Cooper (1 shared paper)Mike Press (1 shared paper)Elizabeth Shove (2 shared papers)Matt Watson (1 shared paper)Daphne Economou (2 shared papers)Stylianos Mystakidis (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Design Studies (2 papers)Design Issues (2 papers)The Design Journal (1 paper)Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (1 paper)Journal of Legal Studies Education (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesUzbekistan
In The Last Decade
Jack Ingram
11 papers receiving 218 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Museology 25
- Management of Technology and Innovation 50
- Human-Computer Interaction 38
- Marketing 58
- Strategy and Management 68
Countries citing papers authored by Jack Ingram
This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Ingram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Ingram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Ingram more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Ingram
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Ingram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Ingram. The network helps show where Jack Ingram may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Jack Ingram, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 146 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 89 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 6 | Designing and Consuming: objects, practices and processes | 2004 | 4 |
| 7 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1984 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1983 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 0 |
About Jack Ingram
Jack Ingram is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Museology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 12 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Educational Games and Gamification (3 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (2 papers), Crafts, Textile, and Design (2 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (2 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (1 paper), Design Education and Practice (1 paper) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Museology (25 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (50 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (38 citations), Marketing (58 citations) and Strategy and Management (68 citations). Jack Ingram has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Uzbekistan. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Cooper, Mike Press, Elizabeth Shove, Matt Watson, Daphne Economou and Stylianos Mystakidis. Their work appears in journals such as Design Studies, Design Issues, The Design Journal, Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) and Journal of Legal Studies Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.