Jack Foster

34 papers receiving 614 citations

Peers

Jack Foster
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Geometry and Topology 90
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 293
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 115
  • Algebra and Number Theory 34
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 23
Replace L. A. Shelepin with:
L. A. Shelepin Russia
Arianna Montorsi Italy
Ilarion V. Melnikov United States
Allan Adams United States
K. Kikkawa Japan
Antonio Fernández Rañada Spain
Xiangyu Cao China
José L. Trueba Spain
К. Р. Хуснутдинова United Kingdom
Richard J. Thompson United States
Jack Foster relative to L. A. Shelepin Russia L. A. Shelepin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21×
L. A. Shelepin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Foster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Foster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Foster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Foster. The network helps show where Jack Foster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jack Foster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Foster Line = papers co-authored together Jack Foster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1970197
2 196973
3 196867
4 201860
5 196847
6 202038
7 201934
8 202028
9 196921
10 201421
11 202414
12 201314
13
How to Get Ideas
200713
14 198310
15 20139
16 20228
17 20207
18 20237
19 19686
20 20245

About Jack Foster

Jack Foster is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Computational Mechanics, having authored 36 papers that have together received 709 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Solid State Laser Technologies (8 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (6 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (5 papers), Laser Design and Applications (5 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (4 papers), Climate Change and Geoengineering (4 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (3 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (90 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (293 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (115 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (34 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (23 citations). Jack Foster has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include L. M. Osterink, Ömer Gürdoğan, J. M. Drummond, Russell Targ, A. Neukermans, Chrysostomos Kalousios, Alexandra Brintrup, J. M. Yarborough, H. Lux and E. O. Ammann. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, Applied Physics Letters, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact