Jack E. McCrae

49 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

Jack E. McCrae
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 199
  • Instrumentation 13
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 58
  • Environmental Engineering 39
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 150
Replace Bernd Harnisch with:
Bernd Harnisch Netherlands
Linda Marchese Canada
Darryl P. Greenwood United States
Changming Zhao China
Salvador Cuevas Mexico
John G. Hagopian United States
David M. Brown United States
Juntong Zhan China
Nicolas A. Roddier United States
Matthew J. Townson United Kingdom
Jack E. McCrae relative to Bernd Harnisch Netherlands Bernd Harnisch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Bernd Harnisch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack E. McCrae

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack E. McCrae's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack E. McCrae with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack E. McCrae more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack E. McCrae

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack E. McCrae. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack E. McCrae. The network helps show where Jack E. McCrae may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Jack E. McCrae, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack E. McCrae Line = papers co-authored together Jack E. McCrae links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201238
2 201822
3 199721
4 201519
5 201719
6 201616
7 199414
8 201814
9 199711
10 201610
11 20249
12 20157
13 20206
14 20186
15 20176
16 20156
17 20185
18 20244
19 20134
20 20164

About Jack E. McCrae

Jack E. McCrae is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Aerospace Engineering and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 58 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (30 papers), Optical Wireless Communication Technologies (11 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (9 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (8 papers), Wind and Air Flow Studies (8 papers), Optical Systems and Laser Technology (7 papers), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (5 papers) and Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (199 citations), Instrumentation (13 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (58 citations), Environmental Engineering (39 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (150 citations). Jack E. McCrae has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Steven T. Fiorino, Santasri Basu, M. C. Ohmer, Milo W. Hyde, Mark F. Spencer, R. L. Hengehold, Peter G. Schunemann, Y. K. Yeo, T. M. Pollak and David Voelz. Their work appears in journals such as Optical Engineering, Applied Optics, Applied Physics Letters, Applied Sciences and Journal of Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact