Jack Bilmes

1.3k citations
44 papers · 872 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Jack Bilmes

42 papers receiving 686 citations

Peers

Jack Bilmes
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Language and Linguistics 618
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 371
  • Literature and Literary Theory 326
  • Linguistics and Language 79
  • Human-Computer Interaction 44
Replace Agustinus Gianto with:
Agustinus Gianto
Paul J. Thibault Norway
M. H. Short Algeria
William O. Hendricks United States
Elise Kärkkäinen Finland
Wolfgang Mieder United States
Lesley Jeffries United Kingdom
Susan Hood Australia
Kieran O’Halloran United Kingdom
Ann Banfield United States
Jack Bilmes relative to Agustinus Gianto Agustinus Gianto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Agustinus Gianto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Bilmes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Bilmes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Bilmes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Bilmes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Bilmes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Bilmes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Bilmes. The network helps show where Jack Bilmes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Jack Bilmes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Bilmes Line = papers co-authored together Jack Bilmes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988163
2 198170
3 198858
4 201157
5 198646
6 199437
7 199736
8 200835
9 199930
10 197627
11 201524
12 199424
13 201424
14 201822
15 199221
16 198120
17 199620
18 200819
19 199218
20 199518

About Jack Bilmes

Jack Bilmes is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 44 papers that have together received 872 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (23 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (15 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (14 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (3 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (3 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (3 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (3 papers) and Rhetoric and Communication Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (618 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (371 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (326 citations), Linguistics and Language (79 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (44 citations). Jack Bilmes has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Roy Ellen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pragmatics, Semiotica, Language in Society, Discourse Studies and Research on Language and Social Interaction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact