Jack Arbit

748 citations
31 papers · 624 · h-index 11

Impact in

    • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
    • Child Abuse and Trauma
    • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Papers in

Jack Arbit

30 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers

Jack Arbit
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Developmental Neuroscience 57
  • Clinical Psychology 294
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 68
  • Health 62
  • Sociology and Political Science 227
Replace Lisa Gibbs with:
Lisa Gibbs United States
Christina Sophia Albott United States
Hung‐Chi Wu Taiwan
Sriram Ramaswamy United States
Levent Atik Türkiye
Abdul‐Rahman Hudaib Australia
K. Thennarasu India
Joseph Rigatuso United States
Sai Zhao United Kingdom
Travis L. Osborne United States
Jack Arbit relative to Lisa Gibbs United States Lisa Gibbs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Lisa Gibbs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Arbit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Arbit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Arbit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Arbit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Arbit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Arbit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Arbit. The network helps show where Jack Arbit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Jack Arbit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jack Arbit Line = papers co-authored together Jack Arbit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974142
2 199086
3 199051
4 198936
5 197636
6 200934
7 200930
8 200930
9 199120
10 200920
11 200916
12 198310
13 200910
14 198110
15 19719
16 19579
17 19679
18 19849
19 19807
20 19807

About Jack Arbit

Jack Arbit is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 31 papers that have together received 624 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (7 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (7 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (3 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (2 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (2 papers) and Pain Management and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (57 citations), Clinical Psychology (294 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (68 citations), Health (62 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (227 citations). Jack Arbit has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Robert John Zagar, John Russell Hughes, Kenneth G. Busch, Mary Jean Bach, David L. Bruce, William M. Grove, Benjamin Boshes, E. Richard Blonsky, E. A. Zeller and Michael Bieber. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Psychology, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Anesthesiology, Spine and Journal of Neural Transmission.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact