Jace Wolfe

1.3k citations
77 papers · 989 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Jace Wolfe

73 papers receiving 950 citations

Peers

Jace Wolfe
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 899
  • Signal Processing 50
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 77
  • Sensory Systems 17
  • Otorhinolaryngology 13
Replace Patti M. Johnstone with:
Patti M. Johnstone United States
Elaine Hoi Ning Ng Sweden
Paula C. Stacey United Kingdom
Kiri Trengove Mealings Australia
Thomas G. Giolas United States
Shilpi Banerjee India
Joan Besing United States
Vijayalakshmi Easwar Canada
Karen Schauwers Belgium
Sharon E. Miller United States
Jace Wolfe relative to Patti M. Johnstone United States Patti M. Johnstone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Patti M. Johnstone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jace Wolfe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jace Wolfe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jace Wolfe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jace Wolfe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jace Wolfe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jace Wolfe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jace Wolfe. The network helps show where Jace Wolfe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jace Wolfe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jace Wolfe Line = papers co-authored together Jace Wolfe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201179
2 201072
3 200768
4 200966
5 201245
6 201540
7 201332
8 200831
9 201528
10 201628
11 201124
12 201624
13 201523
14
Audiologic considerations for people with normal hearing sensitivity yet hearing difficulty and/or speech-in-noise problems
201820
15 202420
16 201519
17 202019
18 201518
19 201317
20 201116

About Jace Wolfe

Jace Wolfe is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sensory Systems, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 77 papers that have together received 989 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (70 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (11 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (3 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (2 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (1 paper), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (1 paper) and Child and Animal Learning Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (899 citations), Signal Processing (50 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (77 citations), Sensory Systems (17 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (13 citations). Jace Wolfe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Erin C. Schafer, Andrew B. John, Myriel Nyffeler, Mark W. Wood, René H. Gifford, Aaron J. Parkinson, Dawn Burton Koch, Smita Agrawal, Jane R. Madell and Christine Menapace. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, Otology & Neurotology, International Journal of Audiology, American Journal of Audiology and Brain Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact