Jace Wolfe

70 papers receiving 828 citations

Peers

Jace Wolfe
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Sensory Systems 341
  • Speech and Hearing 414
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 801
  • Signal Processing 367
  • Otorhinolaryngology 42
Replace Leonard E. Cornelisse with:
Leonard E. Cornelisse Canada
Inga Holube Germany
H. Gustav Mueller United States
Melanie A. Zokoll Germany
Sabine Hochmuth Germany
Mary T. Cord United States
Björn Hagerman Sweden
Lorienne M. Jenstad Canada
Arlene C. Neuman United States
Anna Warzybok Germany
Jace Wolfe relative to Leonard E. Cornelisse Canada Leonard E. Cornelisse's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Leonard E. Cornelisse · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jace Wolfe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jace Wolfe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jace Wolfe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jace Wolfe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jace Wolfe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jace Wolfe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jace Wolfe. The network helps show where Jace Wolfe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jace Wolfe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jace Wolfe Line = papers co-authored together Jace Wolfe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201178
2 201071
3 200764
4 200963
5 201245
6 201537
7 201328
8 200827
9 201526
10 201124
11 201622
12 201621
13 201520
14 202019
15 201517
16 201617
17 201316
18 200815
19 201215
20 201514

About Jace Wolfe

Jace Wolfe is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing, Signal Processing, Sensory Systems and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 857 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (58 papers), Noise Effects and Management (24 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (23 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (19 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (5 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (4 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (3 papers) and Vestibular and auditory disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (341 citations), Speech and Hearing (414 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (801 citations), Signal Processing (367 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (42 citations). Jace Wolfe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Erin C. Schafer, Andrew John, Myriel Nyffeler, Mark W. Wood, Emily Ward, Robert S. Baker, A. Mears, Aaron J. Parkinson, Christine Menapace and René H. Gifford. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, Otology & Neurotology, International Journal of Audiology, American Journal of Audiology and Ear and Hearing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact