JA See

586 citations
8 papers · 484 · h-index 4

Impact in

  • Oncology top 5%
    • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
    • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
    • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
    • Liver Disease and Transplantation

Papers in

    • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection 3
    • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research 1
    • Liver Disease and Transplantation 2

JA See

6 papers receiving 464 citations

Peers

JA See
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Oncology 401
  • Hepatology 25
  • Gastroenterology 11
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 23
  • Biophysics 5
Replace Ilham Serraj with:
Ilham Serraj Morocco
Tomoyuki Tamura Japan
Ei Takahashi Japan
Jung Won Chun South Korea
Jung Kyong Shin South Korea
Hidehito Arimitsu Japan
T. Ponchon France
S. Dighe United Kingdom
Vincenzo Stipa Italy
D. Coumaros France
JA See relative to Ilham Serraj Morocco Ilham Serraj's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Ilham Serraj · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by JA See

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of JA See's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by JA See with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JA See more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by JA See

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by JA See. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by JA See. The network helps show where JA See may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside JA See, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with JA See Line = papers co-authored together JA See links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2008421
2 199630
3 199521
4 19957
5
Free erythrocyte protoporphyrin assay in the diagnosis of iron deficiency in the anemic aged subject. A prospective study of 103 anemic patients.
19914
6 20081
7
[Generalized convulsive crisis during the intravenous administration of omeprazole at high doses].
19940
8 20060

About JA See

JA See is a scholar working on Oncology, Hepatology, Toxicology, Gastroenterology and Small Animals, having authored 8 papers that have together received 484 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (2 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (1 paper), Iron Metabolism and Disorders (1 paper), Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (1 paper), Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions (1 paper) and Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (401 citations), Hepatology (25 citations), Gastroenterology (11 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (23 citations) and Biophysics (5 citations). JA See has collaborated with scholars based in France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Thierry Barrioz, T. Ponchon, D. Coumaros, Jean–Charles Grimaud, B. Branger, PN d'Halluin, Denis Sautereau, Marie-Georges Lapalus, Denis Heresbach and Ilham Serraj. Their work appears in journals such as Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Endoscopy, Annals of Oncology, Endoskopie heute and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact