J. W. Loder

658 citations
27 papers · 586 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

    • Synthesis and Reactivity of Sulfur-Containing Compounds 3
    • Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions 2
    • Biological Stains and Phytochemicals 4
    • Piperaceae Chemical and Biological Studies 2

J. W. Loder

25 papers receiving 542 citations

Peers

J. W. Loder
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Horticulture 13
  • Bioengineering 47
  • Biochemistry 57
  • Organic Chemistry 226
  • Electrochemistry 45
Replace William E. Rosen with:
William E. Rosen Germany
C. R. Noller United States
Sudersan M. Tuladhar United States
Takashi Yatsunami Japan
Naotake Takaishi Japan
Yao‐Pin Yen Taiwan
R. B. Jensen United States
Roger Brettle United Kingdom
Boosayarat Tomapatanaget Thailand
Alvin Ronlán Sweden
J. W. Loder relative to William E. Rosen Germany William E. Rosen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
William E. Rosen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. W. Loder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. W. Loder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. W. Loder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. W. Loder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. W. Loder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. W. Loder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. W. Loder. The network helps show where J. W. Loder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. W. Loder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. W. Loder Line = papers co-authored together J. W. Loder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1983254
2 197751
3 198634
4 199229
5 199125
6 195723
7 196621
8 195419
9 197116
10 197214
11 198212
12 195812
13 196812
14 197510
15 19949
16 19729
17 19728
18 19568
19 19556
20 19884

About J. W. Loder

J. W. Loder is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Pharmacology, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Biochemistry and Bioengineering, having authored 27 papers that have together received 586 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (4 papers), Biological Stains and Phytochemicals (4 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (4 papers), Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (3 papers), Synthesis and Reactivity of Sulfur-Containing Compounds (3 papers), Piperaceae Chemical and Biological Studies (2 papers) and Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (13 citations), Bioengineering (47 citations), Biochemistry (57 citations), Organic Chemistry (226 citations) and Electrochemistry (45 citations). J. W. Loder has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Roland H. Nearn, R. B. Woodward, Francis L. Harris, Victor J. Bauer, Derrick L. J. Clive, David Dolphin, John B. Paine, Michael M. King, W. H. F. Sasse and Albert W. H. Mau. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Letters, Phytochemistry, Polymer Degradation and Stability, High Performance Polymers and The Journal of Physical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact