J. van Lith

467 citations
16 papers · 395 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

J. van Lith

15 papers receiving 385 citations

Peers

J. van Lith
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Bioengineering 30
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 233
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 89
  • Materials Chemistry 58
  • Biomedical Engineering 47
Replace Wico C.L. Hopman with:
Wico C.L. Hopman Netherlands
E. Krioukov Netherlands
Pascal Lauque France
Wenqi Wei China
U. Schießl Germany
Kin Kee Chow Hong Kong
Iroegbu Paul Ikechukwu China
Edgar Alvarado-Mendez Mexico
Yanli Yang China
Minoru Toriumi Japan
J. van Lith relative to Wico C.L. Hopman Netherlands Wico C.L. Hopman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Wico C.L. Hopman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. van Lith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. van Lith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. van Lith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. van Lith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. van Lith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. van Lith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. van Lith. The network helps show where J. van Lith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside J. van Lith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. van Lith Line = papers co-authored together J. van Lith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2006104
2 200791
3 200590
4 200739
5 200519
6 200514
7 200813
8 200712
9 20043
10 20063
11
The Spectral Decomposition Method : a Transparent Theory for Losses in Segmented Waveguides
20032
12 20072
13
The segmented waveguide sensor: principle and experiments
20031
14 20071
15 20071
16 20070

About J. van Lith

J. van Lith is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Bioengineering, Spectroscopy and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 16 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (5 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (5 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (5 papers), Photonic Crystals and Applications (2 papers), Microwave Engineering and Waveguides (1 paper), Copper Interconnects and Reliability (1 paper), Surface and Thin Film Phenomena (1 paper) and Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Bioengineering (30 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (233 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (89 citations), Materials Chemistry (58 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (47 citations). J. van Lith has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include S. A. Brown, Andreas Lassesson, Paul Lambeck, H.J.W.M. Hoekstra, R.M. de Ridder, Wico C.L. Hopman, A. Driessen, James G. Partridge, Ahmad I. Ayesh and Didit Yudistira. Their work appears in journals such as Materials at High Temperatures, Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical and IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact