J. Spitzer

95 papers receiving 3.8k citations

J. Spitzer's Hit Papers

Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory 1996 · 1.6k citations
1.6k0+10+20Years since publication50010001.5k

Peers

J. Spitzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Sensory Systems 1.7k
  • Otorhinolaryngology 415
  • Neurology 813
  • Speech and Hearing 486
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.4k
Replace Hero P. Wit with:
Hero P. Wit Netherlands
Pim van Dijk Netherlands
Marco Pelizzone Switzerland
Astrid Van Wieringen Belgium
Mark Haggard United Kingdom
Heinrich Lanfermann Germany
Jyrki P. Mäkelä Finland
John L. Ulmer United States
Hans‐Joachim Mentzel Germany
David Y. Chung United States
J. Spitzer relative to Hero P. Wit Netherlands Hero P. Wit's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Hero P. Wit · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Spitzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Spitzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Spitzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Spitzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Spitzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Spitzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Spitzer. The network helps show where J. Spitzer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Spitzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Spitzer Line = papers co-authored together J. Spitzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory
Hit paper breakdown →
19961568
2 2003165
3 2003140
4 1986118
5 2000115
6 2005109
7 2002105
8 200587
9 200880
10 200174
11 198269
12 201863
13 201661
14 199960
15 199257
16 199556
17 199456
18 199454
19 199353
20 200735

About J. Spitzer

J. Spitzer is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Otorhinolaryngology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 98 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (35 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (12 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (10 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (9 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (6 papers), Noise Effects and Management (5 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (5 papers) and Voice and Speech Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (1.7k citations), Otorhinolaryngology (415 citations), Neurology (813 citations), Speech and Hearing (486 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (1.4k citations). J. Spitzer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Craig W. Newman, Gary P. Jacobson, Soha N. Ghossaini, Jack J. Wazen, M. Cardona, Ian S. Storper, Ira M. Ventry, Beverly Diamond, Abbey L. Berg and Lanny Garth Close. Their work appears in journals such as The Laryngoscope, Ear and Hearing, Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology and Otolaryngology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact