J. Smith Daniel

519 citations
30 papers · 167 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

J. Smith Daniel

25 papers receiving 151 citations

Peers

J. Smith Daniel
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 25
  • Economics and Econometrics 68
  • Industrial relations 2
  • Political Science and International Relations 40
  • Finance 10
Replace José Luís Cardoso with:
José Luís Cardoso Portugal
Mihály Tamás Borsi Spain
Paul Clist United Kingdom
Ugo Marani Italy
Edward Driffill United Kingdom
Donatella Gatti France
Luigi Cannari Italy
Zahid Hasnain United States
Thomas Apolte Germany
Filip Novokmet Germany
J. Smith Daniel relative to José Luís Cardoso Portugal José Luís Cardoso's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
José Luís Cardoso · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Smith Daniel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Smith Daniel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Smith Daniel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Smith Daniel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Smith Daniel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Smith Daniel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Smith Daniel. The network helps show where J. Smith Daniel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside J. Smith Daniel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Smith Daniel Line = papers co-authored together J. Smith Daniel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201223
2 202117
3 201214
4 201614
5 202412
6 20129
7 20159
8 20219
9 20167
10 20186
11 20206
12 20206
13 19635
14 20105
15 20145
16 20165
17 20233
18 20142
19 20182
20 20232

About J. Smith Daniel

J. Smith Daniel is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Political Science and International Relations, Finance and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 167 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Institutions (9 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (5 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (3 papers), Political Theory and Democracy (3 papers), Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (2 papers), Physical Education and Sports Studies (2 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (2 papers) and Economic Theory and Policy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (25 citations), Economics and Econometrics (68 citations), Industrial relations (2 citations), Political Science and International Relations (40 citations) and Finance (10 citations). J. Smith Daniel has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. Boettke, Alexander William Salter, Alexander Fink, Daniel S. Sutter and Peter T. Leeson. Their work appears in journals such as The Review of Austrian Economics, Public Choice, Journal of Sport Management, Journal of the History of Economic Thought and American Journal of Economics and Sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact