J. Procter

1.2k citations
38 papers · 948 · h-index 20

Impact in

  • Geophysics top 5%
    • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
    • earthquake and tectonic studies
    • High-pressure geophysics and materials
  • Geology top 5%

Papers in

J. Procter

38 papers receiving 924 citations

Peers

J. Procter
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Geophysics 467
  • Geology 119
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 220
  • Atmospheric Science 307
  • Earth-Surface Processes 73
Replace Ines Alberico with:
Ines Alberico Italy
J. C. Thouret France
Pier Lorenzo Fantozzi Italy
Alfredo Mahar Francisco Lagmay Philippines
Derek Rust United Kingdom
Colin B. Amos United States
R. Wessels United States
Javed N. Malik India
C. S. Prentice United States
Darren M. Gravley New Zealand
J. Procter relative to Ines Alberico Italy Ines Alberico's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Ines Alberico · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Procter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Procter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Procter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Procter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Procter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Procter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Procter. The network helps show where J. Procter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Procter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Procter Line = papers co-authored together J. Procter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201072
2 201471
3 201466
4 201457
5 201855
6 201552
7 201445
8 201439
9 202139
10 201435
11 200934
12 201731
13 201530
14 202129
15 201627
16 201724
17 202124
18 201723
19 201421
20 201619

About J. Procter

J. Procter is a scholar working on Geophysics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Atmospheric Science, Artificial Intelligence and Ecology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 948 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include earthquake and tectonic studies (13 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (12 papers), Landslides and related hazards (11 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (8 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (6 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (5 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (5 papers) and Seismic Waves and Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (467 citations), Geology (119 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (220 citations), Atmospheric Science (307 citations) and Earth-Surface Processes (73 citations). J. Procter has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Shane J. Cronin, Károly Németh, Anke Zernack, Ian C. Fuller, V. E. Neall, Manuela Tost, Gábor Kereszturi, Ian E.M. Smith, Matteo Roverato and Les Basher. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, Geological Society of America Bulletin, New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, Geomorphology and Earth and Planetary Science Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact