J. Piasecki

1.5k citations
89 papers · 914 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

J. Piasecki

86 papers receiving 874 citations

Peers

J. Piasecki
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 412
  • Condensed Matter Physics 229
  • Mathematical Physics 130
  • Applied Mathematics 135
  • Computational Mechanics 227
Replace M. De Leener with:
M. De Leener Belgium
Rudi Schmitz Germany
James A. McLennan United States
Elżbieta Góra United States
Patricio Cordero Chile
F. Delyon France
M. A. Manna France
J. Desbois France
B. L. Burrows United Kingdom
Natalia Vladimirova United States
J. Piasecki relative to M. De Leener Belgium M. De Leener's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×23×
M. De Leener · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Piasecki

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Piasecki's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Piasecki with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Piasecki more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Piasecki

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Piasecki. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Piasecki. The network helps show where J. Piasecki may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Piasecki, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Piasecki Line = papers co-authored together J. Piasecki links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199957
2 199955
3 199935
4 199033
5 199531
6 200130
7 199429
8 199428
9 199527
10 199524
11 199622
12 200221
13 201721
14 201120
15 197920
16 199519
17 199717
18 200416
19 200116
20 200016

About J. Piasecki

J. Piasecki is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 89 papers that have together received 914 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (41 papers), Material Dynamics and Properties (23 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (20 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (18 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (16 papers), Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows (11 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (10 papers) and Statistical Mechanics and Entropy (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (412 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (229 citations), Mathematical Physics (130 citations), Applied Mathematics (135 citations) and Computational Mechanics (227 citations). J. Piasecki has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, France and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include C. Gruber, Lydéric Bocquet, Jean-Pierre Hansen, Philippe Martin, P. A. Martin, Michel Droz, Yves Pomeau, Marek Napiórkowski, L. Frachebourg and P. Résibois. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Statistical Physics, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Physical Review Letters and Molecular Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact