J. M. Pearson

829 citations
42 papers · 695 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

J. M. Pearson

40 papers receiving 670 citations

Peers

J. M. Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 546
  • Geometry and Topology 97
  • Radiation 82
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 114
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 230
Replace C. N. Yang with:
C. N. Yang United States
Michael G. Fuda United States
S. E. Massen Greece
W. N. Polyzou United States
P. Stichel Germany
S. König United States
Richard H. Capps United States
D. L. Pursey United States
Hans–Christian Pauli Germany
G. Kälbermann Israel
J. M. Pearson relative to C. N. Yang United States C. N. Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
C. N. Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. M. Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. M. Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. M. Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. M. Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. M. Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. M. Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. M. Pearson. The network helps show where J. M. Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. M. Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. M. Pearson Line = papers co-authored together J. M. Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998121
2 199670
3 198654
4 197840
5 199031
6 199730
7 197829
8 197028
9 199026
10 199425
11 200125
12 199524
13 197923
14 199419
15 198617
16 197015
17 197214
18 198213
19 199411
20 19718

About J. M. Pearson

J. M. Pearson is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Radiation, Aerospace Engineering and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 695 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear physics research studies (32 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (14 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (10 papers), Astronomical and nuclear sciences (6 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (6 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (5 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (546 citations), Geometry and Topology (97 citations), Radiation (82 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (114 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (230 citations). J. M. Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include F. Tondeur, M. Farine, M. Rayet, N. G. Lloyd, Colin Christopher, B. Rouben, Ramesh Chandra Nayak, J. P. Arcoragi, Jean Côté and W. Stocker. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Physics A, Physics Letters B, The European Physical Journal A, Physical Review Letters and Nuclear Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact