J. Lingoes

490 citations
4 papers · 365 · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Journals
Quality & Quantity (2 papers)PubMed (1 paper)CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (1 paper)
Partner nations
United StatesGermany

In The Last Decade

J. Lingoes

4 papers receiving 312 citations

Peers

J. Lingoes
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Computational Mathematics 4
  • Social Psychology 70
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 47
  • Signal Processing 21
  • Artificial Intelligence 62
Replace S. H. C. du Toit with:
S. H. C. du Toit United States
Robert M. Carroll United States
J. E. Keith Smith United States
Terry C. Gleason United States
Karen K. Yuen United States
Regina Dittrich Austria
Steven M. LaLonde United States
Giorgio Caviglia Italy
Edward Hughes United Kingdom
Dawn McQuiston‐Surrett United States
J. Lingoes relative to S. H. C. du Toit United States S. H. C. du Toit's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
S. H. C. du Toit · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Lingoes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Lingoes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Lingoes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Lingoes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Lingoes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Lingoes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Lingoes. The network helps show where J. Lingoes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside J. Lingoes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Lingoes Line = papers co-authored together J. Lingoes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

4 of 4 papers shown
#Work
1 1987318
2
The genetic structure of a tribal population, the Yanomama Indians. X. Agreement between representations of village distances based on different sets of characteristics.
197443
3 19812
4 19862

About J. Lingoes

J. Lingoes is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Social Psychology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 4 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blind Source Separation Techniques (1 paper), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (1 paper), Face and Expression Recognition (1 paper), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (1 paper), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (1 paper), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (1 paper), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (1 paper) and Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mathematics (4 citations), Social Psychology (70 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (47 citations), Signal Processing (21 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (62 citations). J. Lingoes has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ingwer Borg, Francisco Rothhammer and James V. Neel. Their work appears in journals such as Quality & Quantity, PubMed and CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact