J. J. Ding

21 papers receiving 376 citations

Peers

J. J. Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering 5
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 271
  • Instrumentation 6
  • Computational Mechanics 40
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 45
Replace Rosie Johnson with:
Rosie Johnson United States
X. Y. Lv China
Michael Müller United States
Marianne Görlich Germany
M. Roy United States
M. Landgraf Germany
Eduardo Seperuelo Duarte Brazil
V. Tschernjawski Germany
Aditya N. Agnihotri India
J. J. Ding relative to Rosie Johnson United States Rosie Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Rosie Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. J. Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. J. Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. J. Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. J. Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. J. Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. J. Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. J. Ding. The network helps show where J. J. Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. J. Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. J. Ding Line = papers co-authored together J. J. Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201576
2 201363
3 201336
4 201735
5 201321
6 201620
7 202020
8 201319
9 201418
10 201517
11 201112
12 201612
13 20198
14 20175
15 20194
16 20163
17 20193
18 20223
19 20162
20 20212

About J. J. Ding

J. J. Ding is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computational Mechanics, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (8 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (8 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (6 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (6 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (2 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (2 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (1 paper) and Advanced Energy Technologies and Civil Engineering Innovations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear Energy and Engineering (5 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (271 citations), Instrumentation (6 citations), Computational Mechanics (40 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (45 citations). J. J. Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China, France and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include H. Rothard, P. Boduch, Alicja Domaracka, X. Y. Lv, E. F. da Silveira, R. Brunetto, Emmanuel Dartois, Maria Elisabetta Palumbo, M. Chabot and G. Strazzulla. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review A, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact