J. Honig

29 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers

J. Honig
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Computational Mechanics 158
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 67
  • Ophthalmology 47
  • Mechanics of Materials 114
  • Instrumentation 10
Replace A. Conder with:
A. Conder United States
R. Hawley United States
T. Parham United States
C. Haefner United States
Dongxia Hu China
Haitao Shi China
Zhitao Peng China
James R. Luke United States
Weixin Ma China
Scott Winters United States
J. Honig relative to A. Conder United States A. Conder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
A. Conder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Honig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Honig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Honig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Honig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Honig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Honig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Honig. The network helps show where J. Honig may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Honig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Honig Line = papers co-authored together J. Honig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201344
2 200439
3 201336
4 201520
5 200519
6 200417
7 199117
8 199216
9 198414
10 198611
11 200611
12 201610
13 200410
14 199310
15 19919
16 19848
17 19878
18 19925
19 19945
20 19905

About J. Honig

J. Honig is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computational Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 30 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser Material Processing Techniques (9 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (7 papers), Laser Design and Applications (7 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (6 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (6 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (6 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (5 papers) and Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (158 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (67 citations), Ophthalmology (47 citations), Mechanics of Materials (114 citations) and Instrumentation (10 citations). J. Honig has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include J. J. Coleman, Alexander M. Rubenchik, Manyalibo J. Matthews, T.M. Cockerill, J. Bude, Nan Shen, K. R. Manes, M. L. Spaeth, Paul J. Wegner and Mike C. Nostrand. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films, Optical Engineering, Fusion Science & Technology and Journal of Laser Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact