J. Dominian

448 citations
34 papers · 297 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

J. Dominian

23 papers receiving 234 citations

Peers

J. Dominian
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 34
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 80
  • Clinical Psychology 85
  • Health 26
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 56
Replace Alistair E. Philip with:
Alistair E. Philip United Kingdom
J R Davidson United States
Earl S. Taulbee United States
Evy Lind Sweden
Stavros Samolis Greece
E. B. Strauss United Kingdom
Matthew J. Edlund United States
Deborah B. Maia Brazil
Stanley M. Kaplan United States
Katsuya Fuse Japan
J. Dominian relative to Alistair E. Philip United Kingdom Alistair E. Philip's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Alistair E. Philip · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Dominian

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Dominian's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Dominian with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Dominian more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Dominian

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Dominian. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Dominian. The network helps show where J. Dominian may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside J. Dominian, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Dominian Line = papers co-authored together J. Dominian links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197397
2 196337
3 196231
4 196931
5 197910
6 197210
7 19799
8 19639
9 19928
10
The psychological significance of touch.
19718
11 19687
12 19777
13 19835
14 19794
15 19693
16 19742
17 19762
18 19702
19
Proposals for a new sexual ethic
19772
20 19791

About J. Dominian

J. Dominian is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 34 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (2 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (2 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (2 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (2 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (2 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (1 paper) and Treatment of Major Depression (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (34 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (80 citations), Clinical Psychology (85 citations), Health (26 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (56 citations). J. Dominian has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Megan Skelton, E. A. Serafetinides, Michael Dobson, Matthew Dewhurst, Edward Hare, Louise Sharpe, Anthony J. Costello, John Gunn, Bernhard C. Stoeckle and M L Espir. Their work appears in journals such as Theology, The British Journal of Psychiatry, The Expository Times, Studies in Christian Ethics and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact