J. Dimock

1.8k citations
57 papers · 1.0k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

J. Dimock

52 papers receiving 948 citations

Peers

J. Dimock
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Mathematical Physics 380
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 493
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 382
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 279
  • Condensed Matter Physics 162
Replace Orlando Alvarez with:
Orlando Alvarez United States
J.F. Wheater United Kingdom
Roland Sénéor France
J. Bros France
Tadeusz Bałaban United States
Людвиг Дмитриевич Фаддеев Russia
Simon Catterall United States
Yitzhak Frishman Israel
G. Benfatto Italy
Masafumi Fukuma Japan
J. Dimock relative to Orlando Alvarez United States Orlando Alvarez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Orlando Alvarez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Dimock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Dimock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Dimock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Dimock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Dimock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Dimock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Dimock. The network helps show where J. Dimock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside J. Dimock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Dimock Line = papers co-authored together J. Dimock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980137
2 201189
3 198275
4 197460
5 198759
6 197644
7 198539
8 199236
9 197432
10 199125
11 198624
12 197723
13 199522
14 201121
15 199220
16 200420
17 198619
18 201317
19 200017
20 199816

About J. Dimock

J. Dimock is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mathematical Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (25 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (16 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (14 papers), Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (10 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (10 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (6 papers), Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (5 papers) and Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (380 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (493 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (382 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (279 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (162 citations). J. Dimock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include T. R. Hurd, Bernard S. Kay, Jean‐Pierre Eckmann, James Glimm, David Brydges, S. G. Rajeev, David C. Brydges, Thomas R. Hurd and Cheng Yuan. Their work appears in journals such as Communications in Mathematical Physics, Annales Henri Poincaré, Reviews in Mathematical Physics, Annals of Physics and Journal of Statistical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact