J. Baum

693 citations
34 papers · 464 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

J. Baum

31 papers receiving 410 citations

Peers

J. Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 205
  • Developmental Neuroscience 127
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 38
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 50
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 47
Replace Aneta Chmielewski with:
Aneta Chmielewski United Kingdom
Beth Freire United States
K. Hecker Germany
Merja Laisalmi Finland
Oliver Kunitz Germany
James Ellwood United Kingdom
Lars Gramstad Norway
Heike Vogelsang Germany
D. A. Saunders United Kingdom
S.L. Snowdon United Kingdom
J. Baum relative to Aneta Chmielewski United Kingdom Aneta Chmielewski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Aneta Chmielewski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Baum. The network helps show where J. Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside J. Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Baum Line = papers co-authored together J. Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000100
2 199587
3 199934
4 200424
5 199723
6 199521
7
Low Flow Anaesthesia: The Theory and Practice of Low Flow, Minimal Flow and Closed System Anaesthesia
200118
8 200117
9 199414
10 199613
11 200312
12 200111
13
[Nitrous oxide free low-flow anesthesia].
20009
14 20009
15 19989
16 19959
17 20059
18 20107
19 20017
20 19975

About J. Baum

J. Baum is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Emergency Medicine, having authored 34 papers that have together received 464 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (24 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (13 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (10 papers), Biomedical and Chemical Research (7 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (3 papers), Poisoning and overdose treatments (3 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (3 papers) and Medical History and Innovations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (205 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (127 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (38 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (50 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (47 citations). J. Baum has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Curacao. Frequent co-authors include A. R. Aitkenhead, Richard B. Weiskopf, R. Tenbrinck, Carl Lynch, P. Lawin, Harvey J. Woehlck, Hugo Van Aken, Martin Berghoff, Klaus Hahnenkamp and T. Möllhoff. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Anaesthesiology, Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology, Anesthesiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia and Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact