J. B. Orange

59 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

J. B. Orange
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 112
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 512
  • Neurology 405
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 409
  • General Health Professions 480
Replace Feggy Ostrosky‐Solís with:
Feggy Ostrosky‐Solís Mexico
Helen J. Chenery Australia
Anthony M. Paolo United States
Naoko Sakuma Japan
Tarja‐Brita Robins Wahlin Sweden
Margaret Crossley Canada
Richard O’Kearney Australia
Anita Goh Australia
Ilona Roth United Kingdom
Terrence L. Rose United States
J. B. Orange relative to Feggy Ostrosky‐Solís Mexico Feggy Ostrosky‐Solís's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Feggy Ostrosky‐Solís · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. B. Orange

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. B. Orange's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. B. Orange with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. B. Orange more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. B. Orange

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. B. Orange. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. B. Orange. The network helps show where J. B. Orange may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. B. Orange, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. B. Orange Line = papers co-authored together J. B. Orange links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999198
2 1995148
3
Dementia and communication
1991129
4 2018113
5 200798
6 200084
7 199679
8 199666
9 201855
10 201850
11 201141
12 199437
13 201337
14 199837
15 201337
16 200736
17 199536
18 201136
19 201934
20 200534

About J. B. Orange

J. B. Orange is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (16 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (11 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (9 papers), Family Support in Illness (9 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (8 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (7 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (6 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (112 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (512 citations), Neurology (405 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (409 citations) and General Health Professions (480 citations). J. B. Orange has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ellen Bouchard Ryan, Marie Y. Savundranayagam, Michael J. Strong, Gloria M. Grace, Rosemary Lubinski, Herbert A. Leeper, Michael MacLean, Ravi S. Menon, Nancy Stecker and Kerry Byrne. Their work appears in journals such as Innovation in Aging, Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research and Journal of Alzheimer s Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact