I.W. McCall

1.1k citations
17 papers · 768 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

I.W. McCall

16 papers receiving 722 citations

Peers

I.W. McCall
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Rheumatology 207
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 193
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 83
  • Pharmacology 119
  • Surgery 205
Replace Ronald P. Goldberg with:
Ronald P. Goldberg United States
Jean-Denis Larédo France
J. Dequeker Belgium
Fernando Ruíz Santiago Spain
Satoshi Shidahara Japan
Saiko Marui Japan
R S Hellman United States
R. Will Australia
Bernard H. Guiot United States
Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli Italy
I.W. McCall relative to Ronald P. Goldberg United States Ronald P. Goldberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Ronald P. Goldberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I.W. McCall

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I.W. McCall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I.W. McCall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I.W. McCall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I.W. McCall

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I.W. McCall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I.W. McCall. The network helps show where I.W. McCall may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside I.W. McCall, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I.W. McCall Line = papers co-authored together I.W. McCall links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1990252
2 1988147
3 2006129
4 200473
5 199343
6 199824
7 200021
8 197821
9 199516
10
Spondylolisthesis: the angle of kyphosis.
198410
11 19969
12 19968
13 19817
14 19873
15 19953
16 19951
17 19881

About I.W. McCall

I.W. McCall is a scholar working on Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Rheumatology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 768 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Radiology practices and education (3 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (3 papers), Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis (2 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1 paper) and Medical and Biological Sciences (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rheumatology (207 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (193 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (83 citations), Pharmacology (119 citations) and Surgery (205 citations). I.W. McCall has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Jamaica. Frequent co-authors include Eric Colhoun, Lisa A. Williams, George Peat, Elaine M. Hay, Rachel Duncan, Eva Thomas, Peter Croft, Victor N. Cassar‐Pullicino, J Oxtoby and P. N. Harden. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Radiology, Clinical Radiology, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, Radiology and Radiologic Clinics of North America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact