Ivar Lie

45 papers receiving 790 citations

Peers

Ivar Lie
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 33
  • Numerical Analysis 85
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 265
  • Social Psychology 228
  • Ophthalmology 51
Replace Leonid Kalachev with:
Leonid Kalachev United States
Jochen Voß United Kingdom
Yu. D. Chashechkin Russia
Pierre-Yves Passaggia France
W. T. Kyner United States
Anne C. Skeldon United Kingdom
An-Min Li China
Feng Gu China
Vivian O’Brien United States
Krishnan Radhakrishnan United States
Ivar Lie relative to Leonid Kalachev United States Leonid Kalachev's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.2×
Leonid Kalachev · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ivar Lie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ivar Lie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ivar Lie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ivar Lie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ivar Lie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ivar Lie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ivar Lie. The network helps show where Ivar Lie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Ivar Lie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ivar Lie Line = papers co-authored together Ivar Lie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199681
2 199472
3 196367
4 198959
5 199958
6 198047
7 198745
8 200645
9 196433
10 196530
11 199429
12
The influence of long-term visual near-work on accommodation and vergence: a field study.
199428
13 200423
14 199622
15 199422
16 196917
17 197714
18
Time factors in VDT-induced myopia and visual fatigue: an experimental study.
199214
19 200114
20 198113

About Ivar Lie

Ivar Lie is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Computational Mechanics, Atmospheric Science and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 47 papers that have together received 865 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (14 papers), Color perception and design (7 papers), Color Science and Applications (7 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (7 papers), Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (6 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (6 papers), Numerical methods for differential equations (4 papers) and Matrix Theory and Algorithms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (33 citations), Numerical Analysis (85 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (265 citations), Social Psychology (228 citations) and Ophthalmology (51 citations). Ivar Lie has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Czechia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Reidulf G. Watten, Øyvind Andreassen, Syvert P. Nørsett, David C. Fritts, Knut Inge Fostervold, Arne Aarås, Torbjørn Utnes, Karl J. Eidsvik, Svein Magnussen and Dante Kalise. Their work appears in journals such as Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Journal of Computational Physics, Vision Research and Applied Numerical Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact