Iva Lloyd

33 papers receiving 563 citations

Peers

Iva Lloyd
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Ophthalmology 83
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 17
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 60
  • Physiology 143
  • Rheumatology 52
Replace R S Kelleher with:
R S Kelleher United States
Lorenzo Caruso Italy
Faiq I. Gorial Iraq
Megan Lam Canada
Mark Cahill Ireland
Jacques Proust France
Jennifer A. Wong United States
Lilia Aikawa da Silveira United States
Xiaoning Yu China
Rahamim Avisar Israel
Iva Lloyd relative to R S Kelleher United States R S Kelleher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×59×
R S Kelleher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Iva Lloyd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Iva Lloyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iva Lloyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iva Lloyd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Iva Lloyd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Iva Lloyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Iva Lloyd. The network helps show where Iva Lloyd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Iva Lloyd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Iva Lloyd Line = papers co-authored together Iva Lloyd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006193
2 201746
3 201941
4 202031
5 201930
6 201725
7 198923
8 202321
9 201520
10 202118
11 199118
12 201014
13 200013
14 202111
15 201510
16 20208
17 20157
18 20057
19 20216
20 20235

About Iva Lloyd

Iva Lloyd is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Ophthalmology, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology and Surgery, having authored 40 papers that have together received 583 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (9 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (3 papers), Vascular Malformations and Hemangiomas (3 papers), Ocular Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers), Therapeutic Uses of Natural Elements (2 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (2 papers) and IgG4-Related and Inflammatory Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (83 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (17 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (60 citations), Physiology (143 citations) and Rheumatology (52 citations). Iva Lloyd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jane Ashworth, Susmito Biswas, Ed Wraith, Amie Steel, Jon Wardle, Jill Clayton‐Smith, Graeme C. Black, J L Noble, Jamie M. Ellingford and Brian Leatherbarrow. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, Eye, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus and British Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact