I.T.H. Foo
Impact in
- Surgery top 5%
- Breast Implant and Reconstruction
- Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
- Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Body Contouring and Surgery
- Dermatology top 10%
Papers in
- Surgery 10
- Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques 9
- Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques 6
- Breast Implant and Reconstruction 5
-
- Dermatologic Treatments and Research 2
- Co-authors
- David T. Sharpe (6 shared papers)David Coleman (4 shared papers)Nicholas Collis (2 shared papers)I.L. Naylor (3 shared papers)M.J. Timmons (1 shared paper)L K Trejdosiewicz (1 shared paper)Charles M. Malata (2 shared papers)Iain S. Whitaker (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (3 papers)Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (3 papers)Burns (2 papers)Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) (2 papers)Injury (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
I.T.H. Foo
17 papers receiving 509 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Surgery 418
- Dermatology 32
- Rehabilitation 19
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 12
- Cancer Research 34
Countries citing papers authored by I.T.H. Foo
This map shows the geographic impact of I.T.H. Foo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I.T.H. Foo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I.T.H. Foo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by I.T.H. Foo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by I.T.H. Foo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I.T.H. Foo. The network helps show where I.T.H. Foo may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside I.T.H. Foo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1991 | 136 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 113 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 101 | |
| 4 | Intracellular actin as a marker for myofibroblasts in vitro. | 1992 | 53 |
| 5 | 2005 | 30 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 21 | |
| 7 | 1990 | 18 | |
| 8 | 1996 | 14 | |
| 9 | 1992 | 13 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 13 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 13 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 6 | |
| 14 | 1992 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 1 |
About I.T.H. Foo
I.T.H. Foo is a scholar working on Surgery, Dermatology, Epidemiology, Rheumatology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 18 papers that have together received 549 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (9 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (6 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (5 papers), Disaster Response and Management (2 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (2 papers), Dupuytren's Contracture and Treatments (2 papers), Research on scale insects (1 paper) and Soft tissue tumors and treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (418 citations), Dermatology (32 citations), Rehabilitation (19 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (12 citations) and Cancer Research (34 citations). I.T.H. Foo has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include David T. Sharpe, David Coleman, Nicholas Collis, I.L. Naylor, M.J. Timmons, L K Trejdosiewicz, Charles M. Malata, Iain S. Whitaker, C. Anwar A. Chahal and Agnete Malm Gulati. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Burns, Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) and Injury.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.