Isabel Rivers

1.5k citations
29 papers · 685 · h-index 9

Impact in

  • History top 0.5%
    • Scottish History and National Identity
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
  • Classics top 5%
    • Medieval Literature and History

Papers in

Isabel Rivers

21 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers

Isabel Rivers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • History 289
  • Classics 78
  • Literature and Literary Theory 194
  • Religious studies 86
  • History and Philosophy of Science 57
Replace Janet Todd with:
Janet Todd United Kingdom
Paul J. Korshin United States
Barbara Kiefer Lewalski United States
Bernhard Fabian Germany
J. Paul Hunter
Claudia L. Johnson United States
Sydney Anglo United Kingdom
Mark Goldie United Kingdom
Howard D. Weinbrot United States
José Antonio Maravall Portugal
Isabel Rivers relative to Janet Todd United Kingdom Janet Todd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Janet Todd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Isabel Rivers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Isabel Rivers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Isabel Rivers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Isabel Rivers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Isabel Rivers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Isabel Rivers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Isabel Rivers. The network helps show where Isabel Rivers may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993150
2
Books and their readers in eighteenth-century England
1982138
3 2000126
4 200591
5 200753
6 199336
7 200123
8
Dissenting Praise: Religious Dissent and the Hymn in England and Wales
201118
9 198812
10 19938
11 20116
12 20034
13 20123
14 20183
15
The poetry of conservatism, 1600-1745: A study of poets and public affairs from Jonson to Pope
19733
16 19812
17
Vanity Fair and the Celestial City: Dissenting, Methodist, and Evangelical Literary Culture in England 1720-1800
20182
18 20092
19 20161
20 20091

About Isabel Rivers

Isabel Rivers is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations, Religious studies, Literature and Literary Theory and Anthropology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 685 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (16 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (7 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (5 papers), Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (3 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper) and Theological Perspectives and Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (289 citations), Classics (78 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (194 citations), Religious studies (86 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (57 citations). Isabel Rivers has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Their work appears in journals such as History of European Ideas, The Historical Journal, Huntington Library Quarterly, Prose Studies and The Journal of Ecclesiastical History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact