Isabel Chien
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
Papers in
-
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 2
-
- Extracellular vesicles in disease 2
- Co-authors
- Charlotta Lindvall (4 shared papers)James A. Tulsky (3 shared papers)Brooks V. Udelsman (2 shared papers)Anne M. Walling (2 shared papers)Elizabeth J. Lilley (1 shared paper)Zara Cooper (1 shared paper)Kate Brizzi (1 shared paper)Edward T. Moseley (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Palliative Medicine (2 papers)Geriatrics and gerontology international (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)International Journal of Medical Informatics (1 paper)Cancer Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Isabel Chien
16 papers receiving 400 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Health Informatics 31
- Applied Psychology 51
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 73
- Health Information Management 10
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 7
Countries citing papers authored by Isabel Chien
This map shows the geographic impact of Isabel Chien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Isabel Chien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Isabel Chien more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Isabel Chien
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Isabel Chien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Isabel Chien. The network helps show where Isabel Chien may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Isabel Chien, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 75 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 70 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 46 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 42 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 1 |
About Isabel Chien
Isabel Chien is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Applied Psychology, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 408 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers), Extracellular vesicles in disease (2 papers), Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis (1 paper), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (1 paper), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (1 paper), Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth (1 paper) and Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (31 citations), Applied Psychology (51 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (73 citations), Health Information Management (10 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (7 citations). Isabel Chien has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Charlotta Lindvall, James A. Tulsky, Brooks V. Udelsman, Anne M. Walling, Elizabeth J. Lilley, Zara Cooper, Kate Brizzi, Edward T. Moseley, Kei Ouchi and Anja Thieme. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Palliative Medicine, Geriatrics and gerontology international, PLoS ONE, International Journal of Medical Informatics and Cancer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.