Iris Wanzenböck

28 papers receiving 940 citations

Peers

Iris Wanzenböck
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 234
  • Business and International Management 52
  • Development 72
  • Economics and Econometrics 434
  • Strategy and Management 247
Replace Maureen B. M. Lankhuizen with:
Maureen B. M. Lankhuizen Netherlands
Mercedes Delgado United States
Frank M. H. Neffke United States
Jürgen Essletzbichler United Kingdom
Rodrigo Arocena Uruguay
Daniel Schiller Germany
Horst Hanusch Germany
Patarapong Intarakumnerd Japan
Edward M. Bergman Austria
Valeria Arza Argentina
Iris Wanzenböck relative to Maureen B. M. Lankhuizen Netherlands Maureen B. M. Lankhuizen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.2×
Maureen B. M. Lankhuizen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Iris Wanzenböck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Iris Wanzenböck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iris Wanzenböck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iris Wanzenböck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Iris Wanzenböck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Iris Wanzenböck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Iris Wanzenböck. The network helps show where Iris Wanzenböck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Iris Wanzenböck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Iris Wanzenböck Line = papers co-authored together Iris Wanzenböck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020191
2 2020102
3 202093
4 202179
5 201477
6 202270
7 201264
8 201447
9 201636
10 201635
11 201929
12 201727
13 201922
14 202419
15 202013
16 202311
17 201711
18 20259
19 20208
20 20178

About Iris Wanzenböck

Iris Wanzenböck is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Management of Technology and Innovation and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 31 papers that have together received 971 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Regional Development and Policy (12 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (12 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (10 papers), University-Industry-Government Innovation Models (5 papers), Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (5 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers), Space exploration and regulation (2 papers) and Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (234 citations), Business and International Management (52 citations), Development (72 citations), Economics and Econometrics (434 citations) and Strategy and Management (247 citations). Iris Wanzenböck has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Austria and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Koen Frenken, Thomas Scherngell, Joeri Hendrik Wesseling, Matthias Weber, Marko P. Hekkert, MATTHIJS JOHANNES JANSSEN, Elvira Uyarra, Kieron Flanagan, Jonas Colen Ladeia Torrens and Thomas Brenner. Their work appears in journals such as Science and Public Policy, Regional Studies, Papers of the Regional Science Association, Industry and Innovation and Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact