I‐Ping Chiang

1.5k citations
57 papers · 1.1k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

    • Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis 3
    • Viral-associated cancers and disorders 3
    • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers 3

I‐Ping Chiang

54 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

I‐Ping Chiang
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Microbiology 12
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 143
  • Cancer Research 111
  • Oncology 173
  • Hepatology 40
Replace Shinsaku Togo with:
Shinsaku Togo Japan
Tatsuo Fukuse Japan
Kuniko Matsuda Japan
Μαρία Ιωάννου Greece
Martina Leopizzi Italy
Wenxia Wang China
Małgorzata Wągrowska‐Danilewicz Poland
Sho Mokuda Japan
Andrea‐Hermina Györfi Germany
Drenka Trivanović Serbia
I‐Ping Chiang relative to Shinsaku Togo Japan Shinsaku Togo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Shinsaku Togo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I‐Ping Chiang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I‐Ping Chiang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I‐Ping Chiang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I‐Ping Chiang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I‐Ping Chiang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I‐Ping Chiang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I‐Ping Chiang. The network helps show where I‐Ping Chiang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I‐Ping Chiang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I‐Ping Chiang Line = papers co-authored together I‐Ping Chiang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201581
2 201079
3 200164
4 200964
5 201454
6 199650
7 202149
8 201244
9 201340
10 200639
11 201338
12 199736
13 201135
14 201131
15 200031
16 201130
17
Langerhans cell histiocytosis of the skull complicated with an epidural hematoma.
200227
18 200625
19 201024
20 201023

About I‐Ping Chiang

I‐Ping Chiang is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parvovirus B19 Infection Studies (3 papers), Cardiac tumors and thrombi (3 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (3 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (3 papers), Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis (3 papers) and Histiocytic Disorders and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (12 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (143 citations), Cancer Research (111 citations), Oncology (173 citations) and Hepatology (40 citations). I‐Ping Chiang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Chih‐Hsin Tang, Tze‐Yi Lin, Kuan‐Chih Chow, Jing‐Yuan Chuang, Ming‐Hsui Tsai, Chauying J. Jen, Wen‐Hu Hsu, Hui‐Wen Chang, Ann‐Lii Cheng and Chi‐Long Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Oncology Reports, PLoS ONE, Oncotarget and Journal of Biomedical Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact