In‐Won Chung

23 papers receiving 617 citations

Peers

In‐Won Chung
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 159
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 143
  • Clinical Psychology 180
  • Biological Psychiatry 19
  • Health 45
Replace Sung Kil Min with:
Sung Kil Min South Korea
Susanne Steinberg Canada
Ali Sahraian Iran
André Barciela Veras Brazil
Sergio Gloger Chile
E. Mohandas India
Elizabeth A. Sykes United Kingdom
Y. Kasahara Japan
Linda Lam Hong Kong
Hamdy F. Moselhy United Arab Emirates
In‐Won Chung relative to Sung Kil Min South Korea Sung Kil Min's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Sung Kil Min · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by In‐Won Chung

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of In‐Won Chung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by In‐Won Chung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites In‐Won Chung more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by In‐Won Chung

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by In‐Won Chung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by In‐Won Chung. The network helps show where In‐Won Chung may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside In‐Won Chung, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with In‐Won Chung Line = papers co-authored together In‐Won Chung links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007182
2 2010108
3 2015106
4 200265
5 201027
6 201624
7 201120
8 201020
9 201415
10 200913
11 201112
12 200510
13 20177
14 20157
15
Pharmacologic profile of natural products used to treat psychotic illnesses.
19956
16 20115
17 20084
18 20134
19 20022
20 20142

About In‐Won Chung

In‐Won Chung is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Philosophy and Social Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 642 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (3 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (159 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (143 citations), Clinical Psychology (180 citations), Biological Psychiatry (19 citations) and Health (45 citations). In‐Won Chung has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, United States and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include Jae Nam Bae, Jin Pyo Hong, Maeng Je Cho, Seong‐Jin Cho, Hong Jin Jeon, Jong‐Ik Park, Bong‐Jin Hahm, Dong Woo Lee, Joon Ho Ahn and Sung Man Chang. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Research, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, Journal of Sleep Research, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior and Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact