In‐Won Chung

789 citations
26 papers · 672 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

In‐Won Chung

25 papers receiving 649 citations

Peers

In‐Won Chung
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 129
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 115
  • Clinical Psychology 134
  • Biological Psychiatry 11
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 69
Replace Yomishi Kasahara with:
Yomishi Kasahara Japan
Hollis C. Karoly United States
Marnina Swartz Israel
Nina M. Shinday United States
Jenny H. D. A. van Beek Netherlands
Joachim Hauser Germany
Hans‐Jörg Assion Germany
Raphael Underwood United Kingdom
Claire L. Donaghey United Kingdom
Joy H. Wymer United States
In‐Won Chung relative to Yomishi Kasahara Japan Yomishi Kasahara's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Yomishi Kasahara · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by In‐Won Chung

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of In‐Won Chung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by In‐Won Chung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites In‐Won Chung more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by In‐Won Chung

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by In‐Won Chung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by In‐Won Chung. The network helps show where In‐Won Chung may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside In‐Won Chung, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with In‐Won Chung Line = papers co-authored together In‐Won Chung links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007192
2 2010111
3 2015111
4 200267
5 201028
6 201627
7 201021
8 201121
9 201414
10 201113
11 200913
12 200511
13
Pharmacologic profile of natural products used to treat psychotic illnesses.
19957
14 20177
15 20156
16 20116
17 20084
18 20134
19 20142
20 20022

About In‐Won Chung

In‐Won Chung is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Biological Psychiatry and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 26 papers that have together received 672 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (9 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (3 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (129 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (115 citations), Clinical Psychology (134 citations), Biological Psychiatry (11 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (69 citations). In‐Won Chung has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, Ethiopia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Maeng Je Cho, Jae Nam Bae, Jin Pyo Hong, Seong‐Jin Cho, Hong Jin Jeon, Jong‐Ik Park, Dong Woo Lee, Bong‐Jin Hahm, Sung Man Chang and Joon Ho Ahn. Their work appears in journals such as Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, Psychiatry Research, Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease and Alcohol.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact