In‐Uck Park

21 papers receiving 206 citations

Peers

In‐Uck Park
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Management Science and Operations Research 97
  • General Decision Sciences 11
  • Safety Research 44
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 32
  • Accounting 29
Replace Domenico Menicucci with:
Domenico Menicucci Italy
Humberto Moreira Brazil
Lambert Schoonbeek Netherlands
P. Bag United Kingdom
Claude Hillinger Germany
Torben Stühmeier Germany
Elisabeth Schulte Germany
Christopher L. Cavanagh United States
Anna Mikusheva United States
Andriy Norets United States
In‐Uck Park relative to Domenico Menicucci Italy Domenico Menicucci's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Domenico Menicucci · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by In‐Uck Park

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of In‐Uck Park's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by In‐Uck Park with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites In‐Uck Park more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by In‐Uck Park

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by In‐Uck Park. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by In‐Uck Park. The network helps show where In‐Uck Park may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside In‐Uck Park, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with In‐Uck Park Line = papers co-authored together In‐Uck Park links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201373
2 200919
3 200317
4 199916
5 199716
6 201416
7 200411
8
Competitive planned obsolescence
20056
9
Cheap-Talk Referrals of Differentiated Experts in Repeated Relationships
20056
10 20046
11 20026
12 20176
13
Delegated Contracting and Corporate Hierarchies
20044
14 20034
15 19964
16 20033
17 20033
18 20062
19 20092
20 20221

About In‐Uck Park

In‐Uck Park is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Safety Research and Accounting, having authored 25 papers that have together received 223 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Applications (10 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (8 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (4 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (4 papers), Economic theories and models (3 papers), Merger and Competition Analysis (3 papers) and Intellectual Property and Patents (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (97 citations), General Decision Sciences (11 citations), Safety Research (44 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (32 citations) and Accounting (29 citations). In‐Uck Park has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Marcus R. Munafò, Andrew McLennan, Jack Ochs, Bruno Jullien, Paul A. Grout, Chongwoo Choe, Edward J. Green and Andreas Blume. Their work appears in journals such as The RAND Journal of Economics, Theoretical Economics, Journal of Economic Theory, The Economic Journal and Games and Economic Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact