Countries where authors publish in European Business Law Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in European Business Law Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in European Business Law Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites European Business Law Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in European Business Law Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in European Business Law Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in European Business Law Review.
About European Business Law Review
The 905 papers published in European Business Law Review in the last decades have received a total of 2.0k indexed citations . Papers published in European Business Law Review usually cover Strategy and Management (396 papers), Law (238 papers), Accounting (217 papers), Finance (104 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (209 papers) specifically the topics of Corporate Governance and Law (261 papers), European and International Contract Law (127 papers), Taxation and Legal Issues (112 papers), European and International Law Studies (106 papers), Corporate Insolvency and Governance (74 papers), Corporate Law and Human Rights (67 papers), International Arbitration and Investment Law (67 papers) and Global Financial Regulation and Crises (66 papers). The most active scholars publishing in European Business Law Review are Kern Alexander, Luca Enriques, Andrew Keay, Fabian Amtenbrink, Laurence Gormley, Katja Langenbucher, Stephen Weatherill, Antonio Fici, Jeswald W. Salacuse and Karin Buhmann.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.