European Business Law Review

818 papers and 1.3k indexed citations

About

The 818 papers published in European Business Law Review in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations. Papers published in European Business Law Review usually cover Strategy and Management (355 papers), Law (214 papers) and Accounting (189 papers) specifically the topics of Corporate Governance and Law (234 papers), European and International Contract Law (113 papers) and European and International Law Studies (99 papers). The most active scholars publishing in European Business Law Review are Luca Enriques, Andrew Keay, Stephen Weatherill, Fabian Amtenbrink, Antonio Fici, Katja Langenbucher, Jeswald W. Salacuse, Javier Solana, Karin Buhmann and Marc Quintyn.

In The Last Decade

European Business Law Review

376 papers receiving 885 citations

Fields of papers published in European Business Law Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in European Business Law Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in European Business Law Review.

Countries where authors publish in European Business Law Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in European Business Law Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in European Business Law Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites European Business Law Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026