Inger Moen

625 citations
28 papers · 478 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Inger Moen

28 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

Inger Moen
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 220
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 243
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 130
  • Physiology 48
  • Developmental Neuroscience 3
Replace Andus Wing-Kuen Wong with:
Andus Wing-Kuen Wong Hong Kong
Sarah A. Chabal United States
Jasmin Sadat France
Neeraja Sadagopan United States
Outi Tuomainen United Kingdom
David P. Snow United States
Elizabeth A. Wieland United States
Carlin F. Hageman United States
Ingrid Aichert Germany
Sonia A. Cornell Germany
Inger Moen relative to Andus Wing-Kuen Wong Hong Kong Andus Wing-Kuen Wong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Andus Wing-Kuen Wong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inger Moen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inger Moen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inger Moen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inger Moen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inger Moen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inger Moen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inger Moen. The network helps show where Inger Moen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Inger Moen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Inger Moen Line = papers co-authored together Inger Moen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200865
2 200860
3 200759
4 200647
5 200041
6 200924
7 200823
8 201521
9 200919
10 200618
11 199617
12 200817
13 199014
14 199713
15 20048
16 20097
17 20016
18 19933
19 19932
20 20032

About Inger Moen

Inger Moen is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Physiology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 28 papers that have together received 478 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phonetics and Phonology Research (14 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (13 papers), Language Development and Disorders (5 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (3 papers), Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (2 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (1 paper) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (220 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (243 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (130 citations), Physiology (48 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (3 citations). Inger Moen has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hanne Gram Simonsen, Janne von Koss Torkildsen, Magnus P. Lindgren, Lars Smith, Kjetil S. Sundet, Marianne Lind, Kristian Emil Kristoffersen, Ole Edvard Tvete, Sigfrid D. Soli and Pastora Martínez‐Castilla. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, Journal of Neurolinguistics, International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Brain and Language and Journal of Phonetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact