Inge Peters

511 citations
23 papers · 332 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Inge Peters

22 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers

Inge Peters
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 127
  • Reproductive Medicine 110
  • Nephrology 42
  • Rheumatology 25
  • Oncology 32
Replace Zohreh Yousefi with:
Zohreh Yousefi Iran
Peter R. Dottino United States
Nadia Boujelbène Tunisia
Martina Arcieri Italy
Madeline Mason United States
Jung‐Eun Mok South Korea
Susannah D. Copland United States
C Iavazzo Greece
Fani Kokka United Kingdom
Enzo Ricciardi Italy
Inge Peters relative to Zohreh Yousefi Iran Zohreh Yousefi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×21×
Zohreh Yousefi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inge Peters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inge Peters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inge Peters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inge Peters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inge Peters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inge Peters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inge Peters. The network helps show where Inge Peters may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Inge Peters, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Inge Peters Line = papers co-authored together Inge Peters links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200856
2
Pelvic dysfunctions and quality of life after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a multicenter comparative study.
201255
3 201053
4 202343
5 201628
6 201718
7 200114
8 202012
9 202310
10 20169
11 20236
12 20245
13 20105
14 20175
15 20134
16 20142
17 20242
18 20231
19 20241
20 20221

About Inge Peters

Inge Peters is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology and Surgery, having authored 23 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (8 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (7 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (3 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (2 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (2 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (2 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (1 paper) and Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (127 citations), Reproductive Medicine (110 citations), Nephrology (42 citations), Rheumatology (25 citations) and Oncology (32 citations). Inge Peters has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Roberto Clarizia, Giovanni Roviglione, Francesco Bruni, Marcello Ceccaroni, J. H. H. Ehrich, Hermann Haller, Peter J.K. Kuppen, Michele Peiretti, M. Mengel and Johannes Achenbach. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, European Journal of Cancer, Molecular Imaging and Biology, Clinical Cancer Research and BMC Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact