Inge Koch

819 citations
62 papers · 536 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Inge Koch

57 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers

Inge Koch
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Statistics and Probability 119
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 79
  • Finance 37
  • Artificial Intelligence 119
  • Analytical Chemistry 33
Replace Keh‐Shin Lii with:
Keh‐Shin Lii United States
Orietta Nicolis Chile
Matthew A. Nunes United Kingdom
David W. Scott
José E. Chacón Spain
Marc Raimondo Australia
J. D. P. Meldrum United Kingdom
Gérard Biau France
Michiel Debruyne Belgium
William S. Meisel United States
Inge Koch relative to Keh‐Shin Lii United States Keh‐Shin Lii's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Keh‐Shin Lii · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inge Koch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inge Koch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inge Koch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inge Koch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inge Koch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inge Koch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inge Koch. The network helps show where Inge Koch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Inge Koch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Inge Koch Line = papers co-authored together Inge Koch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200868
2 201946
3 201340
4 200931
5 200322
6 199222
7 202417
8 201217
9 201616
10 200914
11 200412
12 200512
13 201512
14 200112
15 200212
16 199612
17 201110
18 197910
19 20169
20 20129

About Inge Koch

Inge Koch is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 62 papers that have together received 536 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Statistical Methods and Inference (10 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (7 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (6 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (5 papers), Stochastic processes and financial applications (4 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (4 papers), Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (3 papers) and Control Systems and Identification (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (119 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (79 citations), Finance (37 citations), Artificial Intelligence (119 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (33 citations). Inge Koch has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include M. P. Wand, Tarn Duong, Abd‐Krim Seghouane, Navid Shokouhi, Peter Hall, I.K. Craig, M. C. Jones, Kanta Naito, Arcot Sowmya and Paul H. Garthwaite. Their work appears in journals such as Ultrasonic Imaging, Advances in Applied Probability, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Electronic Journal of Statistics and SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact