Inez Van de Weyer
About
In The Last Decade
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inez Van de Weyer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inez Van de Weyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inez Van de Weyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Inez Van de Weyer. Inez Van de Weyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Inez Van de Weyer
12 papers receiving 854 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Inez Van de Weyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inez Van de Weyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inez Van de Weyer. The network helps show where Inez Van de Weyer may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Inez Van de Weyer
This map shows the geographic impact of Inez Van de Weyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inez Van de Weyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inez Van de Weyer more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.