Inês Pinto
Impact in
- Accounting top 5%
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
- Corporate Finance and Governance
- Risk Management in Financial Firms
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
- Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Papers in
- Accounting 18
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 14
- Corporate Finance and Governance 11
-
- Financial Reporting and Valuation Research 6
- Co-authors
- Ana Isabel Morais (9 shared papers)Winnie Ng Picoto (8 shared papers)Cristina Gaio (5 shared papers)Ana Venâncio (2 shared papers)Tiago Gonçalves (1 shared paper)J. Frederico Marques (1 shared paper)Sofía Morais (1 shared paper)Reiner Quick (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Inês Pinto
25 papers receiving 624 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Accounting 278
- Strategy and Management 185
- Business and International Management 20
- Information Systems and Management 55
- Marketing 61
Countries citing papers authored by Inês Pinto
This map shows the geographic impact of Inês Pinto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inês Pinto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inês Pinto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Inês Pinto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inês Pinto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inês Pinto. The network helps show where Inês Pinto may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Inês Pinto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 190 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 124 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 47 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 47 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 40 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 37 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 27 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 2 |
About Inês Pinto
Inês Pinto is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Finance, having authored 29 papers that have together received 662 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (14 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (11 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (6 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (3 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers) and Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (278 citations), Strategy and Management (185 citations), Business and International Management (20 citations), Information Systems and Management (55 citations) and Marketing (61 citations). Inês Pinto has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Austria and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ana Isabel Morais, Winnie Ng Picoto, Cristina Gaio, Ana Venâncio, Tiago Gonçalves, J. Frederico Marques, Sofía Morais, Reiner Quick, María José Chambel and António Manuel Marques. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Research, Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Behavior Research Methods and Journal of Cleaner Production.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.