Ines Monte

2.4k citations
68 papers · 1.2k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Ines Monte

63 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Ines Monte
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 641
  • Oncology 204
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 152
  • Physiology 126
  • Genetics 50
Replace Giselle C. Meléndez with:
Giselle C. Meléndez United States
Charles Guénancia France
Tetsuya Tatsumi Japan
G Ghigliotti Italy
Namık Kemal Eryol Türkiye
Mariele Dessì Italy
Ryuji Fukazawa Japan
G. Takemura Japan
Matthias Totzeck Germany
Afshin Ehsan United States
Ines Monte relative to Giselle C. Meléndez United States Giselle C. Meléndez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Giselle C. Meléndez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ines Monte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Monte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Monte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Monte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Monte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Monte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Monte. The network helps show where Ines Monte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ines Monte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ines Monte Line = papers co-authored together Ines Monte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018128
2 201798
3 201279
4 201659
5 201949
6 201644
7 201539
8 201936
9 201535
10 201235
11 200933
12 202330
13 201529
14 201028
15 201628
16 201525
17 201625
18 201522
19 201922
20 201422

About Ines Monte

Ines Monte is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Physiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation (17 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (16 papers), Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (9 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (9 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (5 papers), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (5 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (4 papers) and Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (641 citations), Oncology (204 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (152 citations), Physiology (126 citations) and Genetics (50 citations). Ines Monte has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Concetta Zito, Carlo G. Tocchetti, Giuseppina Novo, Rosalinda Madonna, Giuseppe Mercuro, Paolo Spallarossa, Pasquale Pagliaro, Alessia Pepe, Donato Mele and Christian Cadeddu Dessalvi. Their work appears in journals such as Heart Failure Reviews, Genes, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, International Journal of Cardiology and BioMed Research International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact