Ines Frederix

3.7k citations
50 papers · 1.4k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Ines Frederix

50 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Ines Frederix
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 879
  • Rehabilitation 161
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 176
  • Applied Psychology 30
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 132
Replace Ewa Piotrowicz with:
Ewa Piotrowicz Poland
Werner Benzer Austria
J. Jolliffe United Kingdom
Miguel Mendes Portugal
Hareld Kemps Netherlands
Karen Lui United States
Sandeep Aggarwal United States
Anna Zawada Poland
Maria Bäck Sweden
David W. Schopfer United States
Ines Frederix relative to Ewa Piotrowicz Poland Ewa Piotrowicz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Ewa Piotrowicz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ines Frederix

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Frederix's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Frederix with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Frederix more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Frederix

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Frederix. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Frederix. The network helps show where Ines Frederix may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ines Frederix, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ines Frederix Line = papers co-authored together Ines Frederix links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020175
2 2014147
3 2015133
4 2017113
5 2016111
6 2015103
7 202096
8 201383
9 201957
10 201836
11 201734
12 201827
13 201727
14 201924
15 202022
16 201818
17 201818
18 201617
19 201516
20 202215

About Ines Frederix

Ines Frederix is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Complementary and alternative medicine, Rehabilitation and General Health Professions, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Health and Mental Health (29 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (6 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (5 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (5 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (5 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (4 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (3 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (879 citations), Rehabilitation (161 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (176 citations), Applied Psychology (30 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (132 citations). Ines Frederix has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Paul Dendale, Dominique Hansen, Massimo Piepoli, Niels Van Driessche, Kaatje Goetschalckx, Martijn Scherrenberg, Luc Vanhees, Karin Coninx, Heinz Völler and Dominique Vandijck. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, European Journal of Applied Physiology, Journal of Medical Internet Research and BMC Cardiovascular Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact