Ina Ly
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Jaishri O. Blakeley (8 shared papers)Patrick Y. Wen (4 shared papers)Elizabeth R. Gerstner (5 shared papers)Jörg Dietrich (5 shared papers)Tracy T. Batchelor (6 shared papers)Ovidiu C. Andronesi (2 shared papers)Bruce R. Rosen (3 shared papers)S. Andrew (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Investigative Dermatology (4 papers)Neurology (4 papers)Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Nature Communications (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ina Ly
25 papers receiving 411 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Genetics 171
- Neurology 178
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 79
- Rheumatology 47
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 53
Countries citing papers authored by Ina Ly
This map shows the geographic impact of Ina Ly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ina Ly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ina Ly more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ina Ly
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ina Ly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ina Ly. The network helps show where Ina Ly may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ina Ly, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 117 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 99 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 3 |
About Ina Ly
Ina Ly is a scholar working on Neurology, Genetics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology and Surgery, having authored 28 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (13 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (12 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (7 papers), Soft tissue tumor case studies (5 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Soft tissue tumors and treatment (3 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Brain Metastases and Treatment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (171 citations), Neurology (178 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (79 citations), Rheumatology (47 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (53 citations). Ina Ly has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jaishri O. Blakeley, Patrick Y. Wen, Elizabeth R. Gerstner, Jörg Dietrich, Tracy T. Batchelor, Ovidiu C. Andronesi, Bruce R. Rosen, S. Andrew, A. John Iafrate and Wolfgang Bogner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Investigative Dermatology, Neurology, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, Scientific Reports and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.