In Yang

1.2k citations
73 papers · 963 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

In Yang

67 papers receiving 865 citations

Peers

In Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Atmospheric Science 184
  • Polymers and Plastics 135
  • Biomaterials 120
  • Biomedical Engineering 391
  • Building and Construction 108
Replace Robert R. Meglen with:
Robert R. Meglen United States
Roberto Calvelo Pereira New Zealand
Mick Cooper United Kingdom
Slavka Stanković Serbia
Nguyen Ngoc Minh Vietnam
Daniele Grifoni Italy
Guixue Song Ireland
Bandar A. Al‐Mur Saudi Arabia
Héctor Morillas Spain
P. Traverso Italy
In Yang relative to Robert R. Meglen United States Robert R. Meglen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.9×
Robert R. Meglen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by In Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of In Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by In Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites In Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by In Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by In Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by In Yang. The network helps show where In Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside In Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with In Yang Line = papers co-authored together In Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978105
2 201392
3 200674
4 201264
5 201459
6 201058
7 202138
8 198137
9 202232
10 200631
11 197729
12 197626
13 198222
14 201618
15 200816
16 200315
17 201913
18 200613
19 197913
20 200913

About In Yang

In Yang is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Building and Construction, Polymers and Plastics, Mechanics of Materials and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 73 papers that have together received 963 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lignin and Wood Chemistry (22 papers), Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes (14 papers), Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites (9 papers), Wood Treatment and Properties (8 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (7 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (6 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (6 papers) and Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (184 citations), Polymers and Plastics (135 citations), Biomaterials (120 citations), Biomedical Engineering (391 citations) and Building and Construction (108 citations). In Yang has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Minze Stuiver, Gyu-Seong Han, Calvin J. Heusser, Deland J. Myers, Hanseob Jeong, Monlin Kuo, Soo Min Lee, Don Ha Choi, In‐Gyu Choi and Ho‐Yong Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Radiocarbon, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Food Chemistry, Journal of Wood Science and Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact