In Cho

938 citations
29 papers · 516 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

    • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes 17
    • Metastasis and carcinoma case studies 12
    • Esophageal and GI Pathology 4
    • Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies 2
    • Enhanced Recovery After Surgery 2

In Cho

27 papers receiving 508 citations

Peers

In Cho
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Gastroenterology 193
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 373
  • Surgery 208
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 79
  • Oncology 102
Replace Tetsuo Katayama with:
Tetsuo Katayama Japan
Tom Dehn United Kingdom
Flavia Pigò Italy
Yoshiyuki Komori Japan
Vicky Ka Ming Li United States
Carlo Alberto Schena Italy
Hironobu Goto Japan
José Luis Salvador-Sanchís Spain
Yasutaka Kuribayashi Japan
Elia Pérez-Aguirre Spain
In Cho relative to Tetsuo Katayama Japan Tetsuo Katayama's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Tetsuo Katayama · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by In Cho

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of In Cho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by In Cho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites In Cho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by In Cho

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by In Cho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by In Cho. The network helps show where In Cho may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside In Cho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with In Cho Line = papers co-authored together In Cho links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014106
2 201549
3 201344
4 201441
5 201539
6 202032
7 201229
8 201429
9 201427
10 201521
11 201920
12 201814
13 20138
14 20138
15 20247
16 20147
17 20197
18 20146
19 20216
20 20174

About In Cho

In Cho is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Gastroenterology, Oncology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 29 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (17 papers), Metastasis and carcinoma case studies (12 papers), Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (11 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (4 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (2 papers), Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (2 papers), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (2 papers) and Nutrition and Health in Aging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (193 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (373 citations), Surgery (208 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (79 citations) and Oncology (102 citations). In Cho has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Woo Jin Hyung, Sung Hoon Noh, In Gyu Kwon, Hyoung‐Il Kim, Yoon Young Choi, Ji Yeong An, Ali Güner, Jae‐Ho Cheong, Hyun Beak Shin and Jung Min Bae. Their work appears in journals such as Gastric Cancer, Surgical Endoscopy, Nutrients, Journal of Hypertension and Journal of Clinical Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact