Igor Papalia
Impact in
-
- Nerve injury and regeneration
- Developmental Neuroscience top 10%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Papers in
-
- Nerve injury and regeneration 13
- Surgery 11
- Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation 9
- Co-authors
- Stefano Geuna (12 shared papers)Pierluigi Tos (7 shared papers)Bruno Battiston (4 shared papers)Francesco Stagno d’Alcontres (6 shared papers)Giulia Ronchi (5 shared papers)Stefania Raimondo (2 shared papers)Josette Legagneux (1 shared paper)Ludovico Magaudda (3 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Igor Papalia
15 papers receiving 452 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 361
- Developmental Neuroscience 37
- Rehabilitation 41
- Surgery 206
- Biomaterials 65
Countries citing papers authored by Igor Papalia
This map shows the geographic impact of Igor Papalia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Igor Papalia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Igor Papalia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Igor Papalia
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Igor Papalia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Igor Papalia. The network helps show where Igor Papalia may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Igor Papalia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 81 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 68 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 62 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 52 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 40 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 33 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 30 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 25 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 10 | |
| 13 | The use of sentinel node biopsy and selective lymphadenectomy in squamous cell carcinoma of the upper limb. Usefulness of sentinel node biopsy to avoid useless lymphadenectomies in high-risk upper limb SCC. | 2008 | 4 |
| 14 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 15 | The superior pedicle mammaplasty for the treatment of pedunculous breast. | 2008 | 1 |
About Igor Papalia
Igor Papalia is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 15 papers that have together received 463 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (13 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (9 papers), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (6 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (1 paper), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (1 paper), Wound Healing and Treatments (1 paper) and History of Medical Practice (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (361 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (37 citations), Rehabilitation (41 citations), Surgery (206 citations) and Biomaterials (65 citations). Igor Papalia has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, France and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Stefano Geuna, Pierluigi Tos, Bruno Battiston, Francesco Stagno d’Alcontres, Giulia Ronchi, Stefania Raimondo, Josette Legagneux, Ludovico Magaudda, Maria G. Giacobini‐Robecchi and A Scevola. Their work appears in journals such as International review of neurobiology, Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Brain Research Reviews, Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger and Journal of neurosurgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.