Ignatius Esene

2.0k citations
73 papers · 457 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Ignatius Esene

61 papers receiving 446 citations

Peers

Ignatius Esene
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Health Informatics 35
  • Neurology 124
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 190
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 33
  • Gender Studies 41
Replace Jamie B. Rosenberg with:
Jamie B. Rosenberg United States
Swagoto Mukhopadhyay United States
Naci Balak Türkiye
Joel Kiryabwire Uganda
Amol Raheja India
Joseph R. Linzey United States
Samer S. Hoz Iraq
R. Peter Manes United States
Kongkrit Chaiyasate United States
Divya Srikumaran United States
Ignatius Esene relative to Jamie B. Rosenberg United States Jamie B. Rosenberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
Jamie B. Rosenberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ignatius Esene

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ignatius Esene's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ignatius Esene with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ignatius Esene more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ignatius Esene

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ignatius Esene. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ignatius Esene. The network helps show where Ignatius Esene may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ignatius Esene, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ignatius Esene Line = papers co-authored together Ignatius Esene links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202038
2 201430
3 202129
4 201619
5 202018
6 201417
7 202017
8 202117
9 202216
10 201814
11 201914
12 202312
13 202111
14 202311
15 202111
16 20209
17 20219
18 20169
19 20239
20 20209

About Ignatius Esene

Ignatius Esene is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Neurology, Surgery, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 73 papers that have together received 457 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Health and Surgery (28 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (12 papers), History of Medical Practice (9 papers), Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (8 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (7 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (7 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (7 papers) and Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (35 citations), Neurology (124 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (190 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (33 citations) and Gender Studies (41 citations). Ignatius Esene has collaborated with scholars based in Cameroon, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Ulrick Sidney Kanmounye, Mahmoud Mohamed, Mostafa Alfishawy, Wael A. Reda, Kee B. Park, Amira Elbendary, Claire Karekezi, Mahmoud Nassar, Ahmed Ammar and Amr M. N. El-Shehaby. Their work appears in journals such as World Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery, BMJ Open, Child s Nervous System and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact