Ido Bar
Impact in
- Physiology top 5%
- Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
- Aquatic Science top 5%
- Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Papers in
-
- Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies 5
- Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis 3
- Banana Cultivation and Research 3
- Agricultural pest management studies 3
- Co-authors
- Rebecca Ford (13 shared papers)Abigail Elizur (5 shared papers)David Eisner (1 shared paper)Prabhakaran Thanjavur Sambasivam (6 shared papers)Scott F. Cummins (3 shared papers)J. Brownlie (1 shared paper)Muhammad J. A. Shiddiky (2 shared papers)Yutaka Takeuchi (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMC Genomics (3 papers)Frontiers in Plant Science (2 papers)International Journal of Molecular Sciences (2 papers)Microbial Genomics (2 papers)SpringerPlus (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaJapanUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ido Bar
28 papers receiving 458 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Physiology 80
- Aquatic Science 70
- Horticulture 7
- Plant Science 155
- Genetics 106
Countries citing papers authored by Ido Bar
This map shows the geographic impact of Ido Bar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ido Bar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ido Bar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ido Bar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ido Bar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ido Bar. The network helps show where Ido Bar may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ido Bar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 63 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 47 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 43 | |
| 4 | 1992 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 5 |
About Ido Bar
Ido Bar is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Physiology and Genetics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 465 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies (5 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (4 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (3 papers), Banana Cultivation and Research (3 papers), Agricultural pest management studies (3 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (3 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (80 citations), Aquatic Science (70 citations), Horticulture (7 citations), Plant Science (155 citations) and Genetics (106 citations). Ido Bar has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca Ford, Abigail Elizur, David Eisner, Prabhakaran Thanjavur Sambasivam, Scott F. Cummins, J. Brownlie, Muhammad J. A. Shiddiky, Yutaka Takeuchi, Lior David and Wayne Knibb. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Genomics, Frontiers in Plant Science, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Microbial Genomics and SpringerPlus.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.