Ian Reader

77 papers receiving 773 citations

Peers

Ian Reader
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Geography, Planning and Development 366
  • Cultural Studies 232
  • Sociology and Political Science 691
  • Philosophy 169
  • Health 98
Replace Edith L. B. Turner with:
Edith L. B. Turner United States
Robert S. Ellwood United States
Laurel Kendall United States
Daniel L. Overmyer Canada
Jeanne Favret-Saada France
Joseph M. Pugliese Australia
Arnold Krupat United States
Daniel Heller‐Roazen United States
Matthew Engelke United Kingdom
P. Steven Sangren United States
Ian Reader relative to Edith L. B. Turner United States Edith L. B. Turner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.8×
Edith L. B. Turner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Reader

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Reader's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Reader with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Reader more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Reader

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Reader. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Reader. The network helps show where Ian Reader may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Ian Reader, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ian Reader Line = papers co-authored together Ian Reader links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993145
2 2007105
3 199185
4 201365
5 199264
6 200059
7 200142
8 200041
9 201739
10 201234
11 200224
12 201220
13 201515
14 200015
15 199115
16
A Poisonous Cocktail? Aum Shinrikyo's Path to Violence
199614
17 199313
18 198712
19 202212
20 200211

About Ian Reader

Ian Reader is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Geography, Planning and Development, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science and History, having authored 96 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (50 papers), Religious Tourism and Spaces (24 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (22 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (14 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (14 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (8 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (6 papers) and Travel Writing and Literature (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (366 citations), Cultural Studies (232 citations), Sociology and Political Science (691 citations), Philosophy (169 citations) and Health (98 citations). Ian Reader has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Japan and Estonia. Frequent co-authors include Tony Walter, George J. Tanabe, Richard Fox Young, Bardwell L. Smith, Richard Andrew Gardner, Robert Jay Lifton, Paul L. Swanson, Robert J. Smith, Helen Hardacre and David E. Kaplan. Their work appears in journals such as Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions, Journal of Japanese Studies, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Japan Forum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact