Ian Craft

6.3k citations
191 papers · 3.5k · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

Ian Craft

184 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Ian Craft
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Reproductive Medicine 1.7k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1.2k
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 484
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.6k
  • Genetics 344
Replace Seiichiro Fujimoto with:
Seiichiro Fujimoto Japan
Klaus Diedrich Germany
A. Campana Switzerland
Giuseppe Loverro Italy
Stig Kullander Sweden
T’sang‐T’ang Hsieh Taiwan
Karsten Münstedt Germany
Sandro Gerli Italy
Giampiero Capobianco Italy
Francesça Chiaffarino Italy
Ian Craft relative to Seiichiro Fujimoto Japan Seiichiro Fujimoto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Seiichiro Fujimoto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Craft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Craft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Craft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Craft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Craft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Craft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Craft. The network helps show where Ian Craft may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ian Craft, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ian Craft Line = papers co-authored together Ian Craft links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 191 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1968124
2 1995103
3 200199
4 199997
5 198792
6 199391
7 198490
8 200482
9 199573
10 197168
11 199766
12 199464
13 200764
14 199361
15 198858
16 199556
17 196754
18 198749
19 197148
20 197048

About Ian Craft

Ian Craft is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Surgery, having authored 191 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (47 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (43 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (32 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (32 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (24 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (17 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (16 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (1.7k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (1.2k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (484 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.6k citations) and Genetics (344 citations). Ian Craft has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include M. Tsirigotis, A. Gorgy, C W Venables, Barbara Podsiadly, Joyce Harper, Talha Al‐Shawaf, Irene J. Wise, Pankaj Shrivastav, Kamal Ahuja and Paul Serhal. Their work appears in journals such as Human Reproduction, The Lancet, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Fertility and Sterility.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact